armasight-ad.png
Silencer_Shop_468x60

Long Back British PLCE Bergen – A Military Classic

I’ve been lusting after a British Short Back PLCE military bergen for about 9 months now.  Just a clarification of terms, “bergen” means the same as backpack. PLCE stands for Personal Load Carrying Equipment. Think of it as the British equivalent of our old ALICE system. I’ve tried everything to replicate on, from a medium alice to a ILBE Marine pack.  Nothing has worked quite like I wanted to. The ILBE is just too damn long, meant to be carried like an alpine rucksack and transfer the weight of your load to your hips via its padded hip belt.

The ALICE is decent, but the frame is a bit too long to sit on top of webbing. When I try to The MOLLE II rucksack came close when I shortened it up, but I didn’t care for the external plastic frame. As for the ALICE? Well, I’ve tried a mixture of MOLLE and ALICE parts, including chopping up an ALICE frame. No success just yet. I needed a Short Back PLCE bergen.

However, these bergens are very expensive to import from the UK. I found a surplus British PLCE Bergen available from Billings Army Navy surplus, all the way out in Montana. I called them up and asked if the packs were the Short Back or Long Back versions. They weren’t sure, and couldn’t find any markings on their stock, so I took a chance and ordered one.

With trembling hands, I opened the package. Sadly, this is not a Short Back, but a Long. Short Back bergens have five horizontal ribs of padding on the back. The long back has six. It is not the bergen I was looking for.

It’s important to note that Zach over at Billings Army-Navy had gone the extra mile for me. He had a half-dozen of these packs on hand and I’d requested the shortest, fattest one. He did just as I’d asked, for no extra charge. He went through their stock and picked out the cleanest, shortest, fattest one, including a hand-written note with the order.

PLCE Bergen Frame

The internal frame of the PLCE Long-Back Bergen

Why Short?

The point is to have a short, squat pack that will rest on my MOLLE battle belt the way that British troops’ bergens rest on their webbing. This allows you to carry a large rucksack while still keeping your load-carrying system on you for combat. The bergen resting on your webbing will transfer some of the weight to your hips, but not so much as to push your belt down. The long back version was made for British soldiers who were over 6 feet tall. Since I’m only about 5’8″, I figured I needed a Short Back.

Now, conjecture is fine, but here at Tactical Gun Review, we rely on actual testing and evaluation.

It’s immediately apparent that this pack has been used. The reason that Zack hadn’t been able to read the tag is that it’s so worn as to be unreadable. There are a few very small patches at the bottom of one side and the stitching on the carry handle at the top of the shoulder straps has seen better days. Not overly concerning, as this pack is built like a tank.

The previous owner’s name and unit, stenciled in black sharpie, have been crossed out. The camouflage pattern, called Disruptive Pattern Material (or DPM), is faded. Well, it is on the main body of the pack.

PLCE_hike01

The side pockets,  (also known as “rockets”) are’t faded at all. This is because they’re not British military issue. The ones included are made by Mil-Tec and are not fully compatible with the British PLCE Bergen. The British military Bergen has MOD (Ministry of Defense) standard side-release buckles. They will interface with the newer buckles that come with the Osprey Mk4 armor carrier I recently reviewed. The buckles on the Mil-Tec side pouches don’t work with the British ones, which is a bit of an oversight on Mil-Tec’s part. Seriously, how hard is it to include the correct buckle in your product, so that it’s compatible with the original military issue product?

With a little more research, I found that this combination of reproduction and original is going to be common at pretty much any shop in the United States. Sturm Mil-Tec USA actually imports the rucksacks and then sends them to surplus stores. The picture from their site (showing the brighter-colored side pockets) can be found on other surplus sites. The one site I found that didn’t use the stock image was a shop in Canada, that charges $50 more.

Anyway, the pockets aren’t a big issue with the bergen, as the pockets’ primary method of attaching to the sides is via heavy-duty zipper. These two pockets will zip onto each other, and with the included straps, make a handy 20L day bag.

Carrying Capacity

PLCE Bergen contentsCarrying capacity is a huge consideration when looking at a rucksack. If you’re just looking for a short assault bag, you can be happy with a Marine ILBE assault pack or a medium ALICE pack. The ILBE assault pack carries 24 liters (15oo cui) and is handy for short excursions. A Medium ALICE pack is about 46 liters (2800 cui), while a Large ALICE is 62 liters (3800 cui). The MOLLE II rucksack main pouch is 65.5 liters (4000 cui), and the sustainment pouches on the sides add more than 8 liters each, for an impressive total of 82 liters (5000 cui).

The USMC Improve Load Bearing Equipment main pack has a 74 liter (4500 cui) capacity, though you can add another 8 liters for the pack lid. This puts it right there neck-and neck with the MOLLE. If you were to add sustainment pouches to the side via MOLLE webbing, it would raise the volume to a whopping 98 liters.

The British PLCE Bergen blows all of these packs away. The main pouch is a full 100 liters  The volume of the bergen is impressive. Even without the two side pouches, it’s a full 100 liters (6102 cubic inches). With the two side pouches, it’s a staggering 120 liters (7322 cui). And believe me, if you load this thing up to capacity, you will be staggering.

Last weekend, I loaded up the Bergen and headed out to a local trail. We headed up the path (with TJ humping the German Kampfrucksack on top of his old ALICE belt). I had roughly 20 pounds (9kg) on the belt kit and another 45 pounds (20kg) in the Bergen. It wasn’t long before I started feeling the weight.

Bergen and Kampruck at camp

The PLCE Bergen is covered by a flecktarn shirt. This was our campsite. Very basic, especially since it was 30 degrees that night with howling wind.

The padding on the shoulder straps is rather light, not quite enough for large loads. In addition, the Bergen lacks a sternum strap, which would have been very useful on the ascent up the ridge. When dropping the ruck, I took particular note of the lack of quick-release buckles on the bottom of the straps. Like the Marine ILBE, the Bergen is an internal-frame pack. This can lead to a very sweaty back, but keeps the load closer to your body. Of course, this leads to a sweaty back.

The waist belt isn’t used like the hip belts of a ILBE or a MOLLE rucksack. It’s not cinched around the hips to transfer weight to the legs. Instead, it rides above the webbing and the waist belt fastens around the lower belly. It does quit a good job of stabilizing the pack, which is its purpose. This, combined with the wide pack base, sitting on the utility pouches on the back of my battle belt provides steadiness even when moving over rough terrain.

And you know what’s crazy? The Long-Back did just fine. It fits well on the battle belt, though maybe that’s due to me wearing it so low on my hips.

Conclusion

The PLCE Bergen is a unique and hardy rucksack. It has a mammoth amount of space and can be loaded with everything but the kitchen sink. Though slightly less comfortable than more modern alpine packs, it allows the wearer to use a belt-and-suspender kit, which is of particular importance to me.

There are several improvements I’d like to see in the Bergen:

  1. Thicker padding on the shoulder straps.
  2. S-shaped straps, to better conform to the wearer’s body.
  3. The addition of a sternum strap and quick-release buckles.
  4. Closed-cell foam on the back of the Bergen, allowing the wearer’s back to breathe and to reduce heat build-up.
  5. MOLLE webbing for the attachment of other pouches, if needed.
  6. A floating, detachable lid. It’s one of the things I like about the ILBE.

Interestingly, I believe most of these improvements have been implemented in the SAS/Para Bergen available from Military Ops. They still don’t have quick-release buckles, which confounds me. We’ve had them on our packs since the old ALICE rucks. Oh well, I’m sure those could be easily added.

– By Allen Cosby and TJ

20 Responses to Long Back British PLCE Bergen – A Military Classic

  1. gvamgvalo says:

    hi 🙂 i have a problem 🙂 i lost frame ( internal frame of the PLCE Long-Back Bergen) i need size for frame 🙂 i will be do its for alumine 🙂 plz help me

  2. Dennis Quong says:

    the simplest fix for the Fastex side release buckle incompatibility is to sand off a little from the bottom of the female clip. The UK Fastex clips are of Metric dimensions and the male side release arms are 1mil shorter; so the mil tec and commercial clips pop off.

    measure the clips first and make sure yours was not a repair/replace unit.

  3. Biggu says:

    Nice review.

    Haha, if you think 120 ltr is big, just wait until you see the Air Support Bergen – Those things start at 150 and end up at 180 liters after adding 3 side pouches!

    There’s all sorts of bergens out there besides the long and short that could break your back…

  4. Rob says:

    I have an extra one for sale on EBAY, brand new with side pockets. 100% British, shortback

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/-/182067279685?

  5. steve says:

    Great review this. OK so I’ll come clean I’m not military, just a guy who likes military gear, oh and guns. Guess through my worries of the way the world is I’d say I was a prepper. However iv taken my idears for the gear I’m getting from the military and a few other preppers (not the bug out gang eather) thinking much more long term. I have a short back MTP bergen and it’s fantastic. My only issue is the padding on the shoulder straps. I have a belt set up should I lose my bergen, to be self sufficient and how the bergen sits above this is perfect. I know you guys have used this gear in the military but it’s good to know iv chosen well.

  6. Rob says:

    Great review

    I am six foot; with boots six foot two. Do you think the Tall would work or should I still go after the shortback?

    As I want to use the bergen on top of my battle belt pouches in the back; I may pull the trigger and order one from the UK. I think the shipping is about $60

    • Biggu says:

      Depends on your preference, and whether you are wearing a belt, armour or not.

      The general answer is that the long bergen is designed for tall people, however some tall people still prefer the short back because they can rest it on top of the back pouches of their PLCE (belt system), and some people find the long bergen messing with their unbalancing to be carrying a tower on their back. One advantage of the short bergen is that it’s SLIGHTLY easier to get kit out of it

      If you wear armour there’s an additional option, which is the ECM (Electronic countermeasure) bergen, as it has two tabs that attaches to your plate carrier. The downside is that since it’s designed to carry a radio or an ECM part of it is made from a mesh material (to stop overheating), but it’s not going to matter too much because all your kit should be in waterproof bags anyway.

      Final note, make sure you don’t end up buying a copy, such as one from Web-tex, avoid them like the plague, they are designed for the cadet/airsofting crowd in mind.

  7. tariqsabur says:

    awesome articel and review, thank you!
    Answered a bunch of q’s ive been having about the ILBE as well as curiousity about the British Equivalent.

  8. Diz says:

    Hey Guys:

    I just got the MTP short back Bergen from the old country, and must say, it IS the shit. Long back is fine. DPM, OK. But the new MTP bergens rock. I think even the MTP long back is “convoluted”, same as the “short back, convoluted” Bergen. So if you want to update, either way, there you go. Kitmonster has them both.

    I’ve only done a couple of yomps with it, but so far it is awesome. The short back nests perfectly with my beltkit. You have to cut off the waist belt, and re-form the stays, (unless you’re 5’6″), but after a few simple mods, works just as advertised.

    I’ve rucked all the fancy Gucci brands, and actually prefer the Brit kit.

    • 53gr says:

      Diz,
      This is quite interesting for me. I’ve lusted after a short-back, as stated in the article. However, Kitmonster lists the DPM version as 60 quid and the MTP for 160 quid. Are there any other improvements besides the camo pattern?

      • Diz says:

        53gr:
        Sorry just getting back around. Nah, not any big improvements, other than the MTP pattern, which I prefer since switching all my kit to surplus OCP. You have to decide if the extra bucks is worth it; otherwise the DPM will rock it right out for you.

        I spent the last six months humping Bergens up in the mountains of North Carolina, getting ready for the Fan Dance Endurance Event this July. I actually switched over to a long back Bergen, which seemed to fit me slightly better. Being 5’11” I’m kinda right in between where I can use both. It really depends on your belt kit. If you have typical USGI style pouches then you probably need the short back. If you have the Brit style pouches which ride lower, you can use the long back. Again that’s if you’re right in the seam like me.

        I made a new shoulder harness with 3/4″ closed-cell foam, and added a sternum strap, which makes a huge difference. And made a removable hipbelt, for when I’m running a chest rig without a beltkit.

        I plan on picking up several more Bergens while I’m in Old Blighty. Along with some smocks and other Brit kit. At least I’ll “save” on postage, huh.

  9. Daz Walters says:

    The PLCE Bergen, is a great foundation for updating. I served in the British Army for 14 years using these, we made modifications to make life easier in the field. Addition of pouches and pockets, floating lids. One area I never had a problem with was the quick release straps, this looked to be a weak point if added as the actual weight carried when heading out on exercise/operations was around 50kg when combat ready with rations/ammo/radio batteries/troop equipment and personal equipment. If your using it for no more than 45lbs/20kgs then it should last a lifetime, because the basic combat fitness test required it to weigh 55lbs without water. I still have two one modified and one standard looking forward to using them here in the US. Great write up, very informative.

  10. Ivarr says:

    They are sound rucks. I’m on my second one here in Alaska. My first was well used when i got it but still went on for years..

    Bergmann

  11. Ronin says:

    Just found your site while looking for British Army Bergens. Thanks for the review and it makes me want one more.
    Just a note, you say “After two years in Iraq as a contractor for a defense company, he developed an unhealthy addiction to military surplus gear. Though he’s currently in treatment, the prognosis is that the condition is chronic.” and also that you like weapons.

    I hate to tell you this but I’ve been out of the Army since 1991 and I’m still addicted to Military Gear and guns. You will never be free of it!
    So just dive in with wild abandon and keep buying the gear. But please be sure to keep posting reviews!
    Keep Your Powder Dry.
    Ronin

  12. Spruce Cycle says:

    Great review and pics.

  13. […] I’ve been lusting after a British Short Back PLCE military bergen for about 9 months now. Just a clarification of terms, “bergen” means the same as backpack. PLCE stands for Personal Load Carrying Equipment. Think of it as the British equivalent of our old ALICE system. I’ve tried everything to replicate on, from a medium …read more […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *